DOWNLOAD 2011 EU PROGRESS REPORT ON TURKEY

Page 1 Page 2

DOWNLOAD 2011 EU PROGRESS REPORT ON TURKEY

Dimpool News

05 October 2011

*updated on October 12, 2011

Click the the images below in order to download the official and the draft versions of 2011 EU Progress Report on Turkey.

In order to download the files to your tablet, you can scan QR Codes below with your barcode scanner application.

[wpcol_1half]

Official Version

2011 EU official Progress Report on Turkey
2011 EU official Progress Report on Turkey

Draft Version

2011 EU PROGRESS REPORT ON TURKEY
2011 EU PROGRESS REPORT ON TURKEY
[/wpcol_1half] [wpcol_1half_end]

QR Code for the Official Report

2011-EU-TR-official-progress-report
2011 EU official Progress Report on Turkey

QR Code for the Draft

2011 EU PROGRESS REPORT ON TURKEY
2011 EU PROGRESS REPORT ON TURKEY

[/wpcol_1half_end]

Read the important chapters online

Available chapters: 23, 24, 31

(This section will be frequently updated)

Chapter 23: Judiciary and fundamental rights

[wpcol_1half]

There has been progress in the reform of the judiciary, notably with efforts to implement the 2010 constitutional amendments.

As regards independence, a Law on the High Council of Judges and Prosecutors was adopted in  December  2010.  This  law,  together  with  the  constitutional  amendments  approved  by referendum on 12 September 2010, established a new composition of the High Council46 that is more pluralistic and representative of the  judiciary as a whole. Ministerial influence has been reduced. The Inspection Board, previously under the Ministry of Justice, has now been transferred to the High Council. Concerning effective remedies, appeals to judicial bodies against decisions concerning dismissal from the profession are now permitted.

However, as regards elections of members of the High Council, the system imposed by the Constitutional Court leaves no room for election of minority candidates, because candidates who are elected by the majority of the voters could take all the seats. Nomination of the four non-judicial members of the High Council is left  to the discretion of the President of the Republic, whereas the Grand National Assembly is not involved. The current provisions do not ensure permanent representation of members of the Bar in the High Council. The Minister can veto the launching of disciplinary investigations against judges and prosecutors by the High Council.

With regard to impartiality, a Law on the Constitutional Court was adopted in March 2011. This  law,   together  with  the  constitutional  amendments  approved  by  referendum  on 12 September 2010, enlarged the normal membership of the Court. This has reduced the relative  weight  of  high  courts’  representatives  and  made  the  Constitutional  Court  more representative of the legal community and society at large.

The powers of the Constitutional Court have been considerably extended by introducing the individual  application procedure. Anyone who claims that any of his or her fundamental rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution has been violated by the public authorities can apply to the Constitutional Court,  provided he or she has exhausted all ordinary legal remedies.

However,  the  Constitutional  Court  is  insufficiently  representative  of  the  Turkish  legal community as a whole and still over-dominated by the high courts. The influence of the Grand National Assembly over the composition of the Constitutional Court is also inadequate, in terms of both the number of members it elects and the choice of eligible candidates. As regards elections of members of the High Council, the system imposed by the Constitutional Court itself leaves no room for election of minority candidates, because candidates who are elected by the majority of the voters could take all the seats.

Prosecutors do not have their offices in parts of courthouses separate from that occupied by the judges. They are not required to enter or leave the courtroom by a different door than the one used by judges. Finally, they do not sit in courtrooms on the same level as lawyers. This continues to cloud the perception of the impartiality of judges.

With regard to efficiency, the Laws on the Court of Cassation and the Council of State were amended  in  order  to  tackle  the  increasing  backlog  of  cases.  More  chambers  have  been established,  working  methods  modified and  a  large  number  of  judges  and  prosecutors appointed. Legislation was adopted in March  2011 to reduce the workload of first-instance courts.

However,  neither  an  overall  common  strategic  framework  nor  reliable  indicators  and benchmarks have been established by the Ministry of Justice and the High Council for Judges and Prosecutors to assess the performance of courts and of the judicial system as a whole. The Ministry and the High Council have yet to  develop benchmarks to monitor and assess the duration of court proceedings and improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the judicial system, in order to address the backlog of pending cases and, in particular, the large backlog of pending serious criminal cases.

The current fragmentation of the Turkish courts, which each have a separate registry and are not connected with each other even when they are located in the same courthouse, prevents efficient use of available resources. The regional courts of appeal have not been established yet. By law, they should have been in operation by June 2007. The number of vacancies for judges and prosecutors equals roughly a third of the current judicial staff.

Pre-trial detention is not limited to circumstances where it is strictly necessary in the public interest and is  not sufficiently justified. In some terror-related cases, defendants and their lawyers have not been permitted access to incriminating evidence early in the proceedings. Frequent  use  of  arrest  instead  of  judicial  supervision,  leaks  of  information,  evidence  or statements, limited access to files, failure to give detailed grounds for detention decisions and revision of such decisions raised concerns. No authoritative information  has been received from either the prosecution offices or the courts on all these issues of wide public interest.

There is a need to improve the work of the police and the gendarmerie together with the working  relationship  between  the  police,  gendarmerie  and  judiciary  in  order  to  address concerns raised during investigations in some high-profile cases. A Regulation on the judicial police, adopted jointly by the Ministries  of the Interior and Justice in 2005, has yet to be implemented.  As  a  result,  prosecutors  rely  on  judicial  police  units  operating under  the hierarchical control of the Ministry of the Interior.

A large number of measures in the judicial reform strategy adopted by the government in August  2009   have   been  implemented  by  the  constitutional  amendments  and  ensuing legislation. There is a need to  review the existing strategy in a transparent and inclusive fashion, so that the revised strategy will be owned by the Turkish legal community and the wider public.

Limited progress can be reported on anti-corruption.

In  line  with  the  2010-2014  Strategy  and  Action  Plan47 ,  an  Executive  Committee  for Increasing Transparency and Fighting Corruption48 has coordinated working groups preparing proposals on corruption-related issues. The Committee of Ministers on anti-corruption policy approved all the proposals. Turkey has implemented 19 of the 21 recommendations made in the 2005 evaluation reports by the Group of States against Corruption (GRECO). The Law on the  Turkish  Court  of  Accounts  (TCA) adopted  in  December  2010  should  significantly strengthen the transparency and accountability of public administration.

However, there was no increase in the strength or independence of institutions involved in the fight  against  corruption,  which  are  not  sufficiently  staffed.  Immunities  of  Members  of Parliament or of senior public officials in corruption-related cases have yet to be limited and objective criteria established setting the  conditions under which their immunity could be lifted. Two major sets of GRECO recommendations on “Incrimination” and “Transparency of Party  Funding”  remain  to  be  implemented.  There  has  been  no  progress  concerning  the transparency of financing political parties. Auditing of political parties remains  weak and there is no legal framework for auditing election campaigns or the financing of individual candidates. No steps have been taken to build up a track record of investigations, indictments or convictions related to corruption cases.

As regards fundamental rights, there has been progress in some areas, whereas in others a number of concerns were raised, in particular as regards freedom of expression.

Human rights institutions in line with the UN Paris principles have yet to be established. The draft Law establishing the Turkish National Human Rights Institution (NHRI) submitted to parliament in February 2010  has not yet been revised in line with these principles. This is relevant in particular to the independence and functional autonomy of this new institution. It is important to involve civil society organisations in this process. As regardsprohibition of torture and inhumane or degrading treatment or punishment, the ratification of the OPCAT is a significant step. The positive trend on prevention of torture and ill-treatment continued. However,  disproportionate  use  of  force  by  law  enforcement  officials  continued  to  be  a concern, particularly outside official places of detention.

The growth of the prison population is leading to serious overcrowding, which is hampering attempts to improve detention conditions. A complete overhaul of the complaints system in prisons is needed. An urgent  review of the system for dealing with juveniles is needed to minimise the number in prison and the time they spend there and make sure that detention conditions guarantee the rights of the child.

[/wpcol_1half] [wpcol_1half_end]

With respect to access to justice, the legal aid provided is of inadequate scope and quality. Budgetary provisions are inadequate. There is no effective monitoring mechanism that would remedy long-standing problems.

Regarding freedom of expression, open debate, including on issues perceived as sensitive, continued. However, in practice, freedom of expression is undermined by the high number of legal  cases  and  investigations  against  journalists,  writers,  academics  and  human  rights defenders  and  undue  pressure  on  the  media,  which  raises  serious  concerns.  The  present legislation does not sufficiently guarantee freedom of expression in line with the ECHR and the  case  law  of ECtHR,  and  permits  restrictive  interpretation  by the  judiciary.  Frequent website bans are another cause for serious concern. Turkey’s legal and judicial  practices, legislation, criminal procedures and political responses are obstacles to the free exchange of information and ideas.

As regards freedom of assembly and freedom of association, including the right to form political parties and establish trade unions, there has been progress on the ground. Turkey’s legislation  on  freedom  of  association  is  broadly  in  line  with  EU  standards.  However, demonstrations in the south-east of the country and in other provinces related to the Kurdish issue, students’ rights, the activities of the higher  education supervisory board (YÖK) and trade union rights were marred by disproportionate use of force. Disproportionate controls and restrictive interpretation of legislation on associations remain. There were no developments as regards amendment of the legislation on the closure of political parties. Restrictive provisions in the current legal framework on trade unions, which are not in line with EU standards and ILO Conventions, remain.

There has been limited progress on freedom of thought, conscience and religion. Freedom of worship continues to be generally respected. The dialogue with the Alevis and with the non- Muslim religious communities continued. However, members of minority religions continued to be subject to threats from extremists. A legal framework in line with the ECHR has yet to be established, so that all non-Muslim religious communities and the Alevi community can function without undue constraints.

With regard to women’s rights and gender equality, protecting women’s rights, promoting gender equality and combating violence against women remain major challenges. The legal framework guaranteeing women’s  rights and gender equality is broadly in place. However, further substantial efforts are needed to turn the  legal  framework into political, social and economic  reality.  Legislation  needs  to  be  implemented  consistently  across  the  country. Honour killings, early and forced marriages and domestic violence against  women remain serious  problems.  Further  training  and  awareness-raising  on  women’s  rights  and  gender equality are needed, particularly for the police.

As regards children’s rights, efforts need to be stepped up in all areas, including education, combating child  labour, health, administrative capacity and coordination. In general, more preventive and rehabilitation  measures need to be taken for juveniles. Moreover, there is a need to establish more juvenile courts in line  with the legislation in force and to minimise detention of children which, in cases where it is strictly  necessary, should take place in appropriate conditions.

With regard to the right to education, the proportion of children in pre-school education increased in 2010-2011 compared to the previous school year. The number of teachers also increased. The primary school enrolment rates (grades 1-8) increased and the gender gap has virtually closed. In secondary education (grades 9-12), the enrolment rates increased for boys from 67.5% to 72.3% and for girls from 62.2 % to 66.1 %, widening thus slightly the gender gap. Turkey signed the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse. However, school drop-outs were a concern, especially among seasonal migrant workers’ families and Roma children. Regional disparities remained wide for both primary and secondary school enrolment.

As regards treatment of socially vulnerable persons and/or persons with disabilities and the principle of  non-discrimination, a strategy paper on accessibility and the related national action plan were adopted. However, constitutional changes allowing positive discrimination in favour of the disabled were not turned into specific measures. A national mechanism for monitoring implementation of the UN Convention on the rights of disabled persons and its optional protocol has still not been established. Lack of data and research  on persons with disabilities and the mentally ill remain a barrier against informed policy-making. Provisions of the Turkish Criminal Code on ‘public exhibitionism’ and ‘offences against public morality’ are sometimes used to discriminate against LGBT people.

On the right to property, legislation amending the 2008 Law on foundations was adopted in August 2011. This is the fourth attempt of the Turkish authorities since 2002 to restore the property rights of non-Muslim communities. The new legislation provides that non-Muslim community foundations can register in the  Land Registry, under their names, immovable property entered in their 1936 declarations for which either the owner entry was left blank, or which are registered in the name of the Treasury, the Directorate-General for  Foundations, municipalities and special provincial administrations, or cemeteries and fountains registered in  the name of public institutions. Interested parties will have to apply for the return of properties within a  twelve-month period from the entry into force of the new legislation. Finally, the market value of foundation properties currently registered with third parties will be paid. This covers properties seized and sold to third parties, and which cannot be returned to the foundations. The Mor Gabriel monastery foundation is covered by the new legislation even though it was registered in 1960. A regulation will define implementation modalities of the new legislation.

As regards respect for and protection of minorities and cultural rights, Turkey has made progress  on  cultural  rights,  especially  on  use  of  languages  other  than  Turkish  by  all nationwide radio and television stations and on use of multiple languages by municipalities. The opening of a Kurdish Language and  Literature Department in a university has been authorised.  However,  restrictions  remain  on  the  use  of  languages  other  than  Turkish  in political life, in contacts with public services and in prisons. The legal framework on use of languages other than Turkish is open to restrictive interpretations and implementation remains inconsistent. There has been some progress as regards the Roma, in particular on amending discriminatory legislation. However, a comprehensive policy to address the situation of the Roma is missing. Turkey’s approach to minorities remained restrictive. Full respect for and protection  of  language,  culture   and   fundamental  rights,  in  accordance  with  European standards, has yet to be fully achieved. Turkey  needs to make further efforts to enhance tolerance and promote inclusiveness vis-à-vis minorities. There is a need for comprehensive revision of the existing legislation and to establish protection mechanisms or specific bodies to combat racism, xenophobia, anti-Semitism and intolerance.

With regard to respect for private and family life and, in particular, the right to protection of personal data, the 2010 constitutional amendments introduced the protection of personal data as a constitutional right. Turkey needs to align its legislation with the data protection acquis, in particular Directive 95/46/EC, and, in that  context, to set up a fully independent data protection supervisory authority. Turkey also needs to ratify both the CoE Convention for the protection of individuals with regard to automatic processing of personal data (CETS No 108) and the additional protocol to it on supervisory authorities and trans-border data flow (CETS No 181).

Conclusion

Overall, progress has been made in the area of the judiciary. The adoption of legislation on the High Council of Judges and Prosecutors and on the Constitutional Court is a step in the right direction in terms of the independence and impartiality of the judiciary. Steps have also been taken to increase the efficiency of the judiciary. However, significant further efforts are needed in all areas, including the criminal justice system.  Limited progress has been made with implementing the strategy and action plan on anti-corruption. Effective implementation of the strategy is necessary to reduce corruption which remains prevalent in many areas. The lack of transparency relating to political party financing and the scope of immunities remain major shortcomings. Turkey needs to build up a track record of investigations, indictments and convictions. As  regards fundamental rights, some progress has been made. However, further significant efforts are needed in most areas, in particular freedom of expression and freedom  of  religion.  Turkey  has  made  progress  on  cultural  rights,  especially  on  use  of languages  other  than  Turkish.  However,  Turkey’s  approach  to  minority  rights  remains restrictive.  Turkey  needs  to  make  further  efforts  to enhance  tolerance  and   promote inclusiveness vis-à-vis minorities.
[/wpcol_1half_end]

Page 1 Page 2

Tags from the story

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

DIMPOOL NEWS
Dimpool is glad to announce that you can download the official and the draft versions of 2011 EU Progress Report on Turkey." />